USPTO serial 76457205
PAPA LOU'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3068606Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAPA LOU'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry L. Coats
LARRY L COATS COATS & BENNETT, PLLCPOST OFFICE BOX 5RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | restaurant services featuring hamburgers, chicken, french fries, onion rings, cheese steaks, chicken wings and shakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 26, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |