Drawing for EL CUCUY

USPTO serial 76457341

EL CUCUY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3009911Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2005
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EL CUCUY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jesse Saivar

Jesse Saivar Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP1900 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment services, namely, radio show performances; personal appearances by a radio personality; providing information to the public in the field of radio and entertainmentSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2026CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 1, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jan 9, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jan 8, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2015E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 12, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 31, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 9, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance