USPTO serial 76457588
ECO-PUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-PUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan S. Weinstein
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUST1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Environmentally friendly insecticides and pesticides for domestic and agricultural use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |