USPTO serial 76457597
PLAYGIRLZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLAYGIRLZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
YOUNG BOM (BRIAN) LEE
YOUNG BOM (BRIAN) LEE LAW OFFICE OF LEE & ASSOCIATES3530 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1280LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-2322UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, DRESSES, TOPS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, PANTS, JACKETS, SKIRTS, SWEATERS, AND SHORTS | ABANDONED | Feb 12, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |