Drawing for DINING IN

USPTO serial 76457615

DINING IN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2952443Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 17, 2005
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINING IN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Broccolo

Andrew J. Broccolo Topco Holdings, Inc.150 Northwest Point BlvdElk Grove Village, IL 60007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ vegetable-based rice bowls; meat-based rice bowls; poultry-based rice bowls; poultry-based skillet dinners; meat-based skillet dinners; chipped beef, stuffed green peppers,] meat loaf, [ chicken breast and potato dinners; salisbury steak entrees;] beef stir fry; [ shrimp and linguini;] chicken stir fry; [ shrimp alfredo;] shrimp stir fry; [ refrigerated entrees consisting primarily of meat or poultry;] frozen beef burgers, frozen chicken tenders; [ frozen meat, poultry, fish and seafood, beef chili;] frozen potatoes [, vegetable salads and soup ]EXPIRED—
030[ beef and poultry pies, shrimp fried rice ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 21, 2015NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 14, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 17, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 14, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 28, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 10, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 10, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 10, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance