Drawing for YAPANDA

USPTO serial 76457969

YAPANDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YAPANDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George R. Schultz

GEORGE R SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES5400 LBJ FREEWAY, STE 525DALLAS, TX 75240UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Job placement servicesACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, transmission of audio, video, textual and/or multimedia content by means of global or local electronic communications networks; electronic mail services; broadcasting programs via global or local computer networks; and electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data signals and messagesACTIVE—
041Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing web sites featuring interactive digital imaging capabilities and artificial intelligence capabilities to simulate real persons with the ability to play interactive computer games with users, provide academic tutorials to users, provide technical instruction and assistance to users, provide employee instruction and training for users, record, create and transmit genealogical information and the creation of a personal history by users, and capture a user's own identity in the form of a virtual personal to be used for online communicationsACTIVE—
042Information services and database development services, namely, database development services; computer programming; computer services, namely website design, customization and implementation services and computer software design; research, development and consulting in the field of artificial intelligence, virtual computer networks and software and internet technology; provide website navigation assistance to users; provide Internet search assistance for usersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance