USPTO serial 76458195
SCOOPY DOO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCOOPY DOO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernard J. Cantor
BERNARD J CANTOR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCP O BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | plastic bags for disposing of dog feces | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |