Drawing for WILA-DERWENT

USPTO serial 76458587

WILA-DERWENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WILA-DERWENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deirdre Stanley

DEIRDRE STANLEY THE THOMSON CORPORATION1 STA PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, CD-ROMs, discs, diskettes, magnetic tapes for data capture, archiving, documentation, research transmission and reproduction of data in the fields of commerce, technology, law, in particular industrial property, scientific and patent informationACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, books, periodicals, text extracts, bibliographical data, and graphic representations relating to property rights, educational and technical reports, analysis, diagrams, and documentation of information in the fields of commerce, technology and law, particularly in the field of industrial property; printed publications in the fields of scientific and patent informationACTIVE—
038Transmission of information, data, graphic representations, images, forms, documents and research results using computer-aided communications networks, including the Internet, for printing out or for electronic use by clients; transmission of information in the form of texts or images by means of facsimile and electronic mailACTIVE—
042Providing information in the field of technology and law, including the acquisition, investigation, capture, processing, and reproduction thereof; installation, repair, and maintenance of software for the capture, storage, transmission, and reproduction of information in the form of texts, sounds, and images; establishing and operating an Internet portal; development, rental and installation of computer programs, data files, data archives for the capture, output, electronic, magnetic, or optical storage and research of data in data processing installations; CD-ROM archives, research systems on the Internet, for one's own use and for external clients from industry, commerce, and research; electronic providing of forms, documents, and research results for printing out or for electronic use by clients; information services, namely, the graphic representations, including images, via the Internet, in the field of technology and law, in particular industrial property; creating, providing, updating, rental of computer software and operation of databases containing information in the field of commerce, technology and law, in particular in the field of industrial property, for conducting research and data analysis, including statistics; commissioned research in national and international databases and archive systems, and on the Internet in the field of commerce, technology and law, in particular in the field of industrial property, scientific and patent information; consultation with regard to computer installations relating to hardware and software applications for marketed technology and law, in particular, industrial property; providing scientific and patent information by means of the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance