Drawing for HAVILAND

USPTO serial 76459001

HAVILAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HAVILAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Richardson

JOHN M RICHARDSON PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Non-electric household or kitchen utensils and containers, not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely,autoclaves, pressure cookers, corkscrews, bottle-openers, metallic cooking skewers, stewing pans, fruit cutters, cutting boards for the kitchen, frying pans, cheese dish covers, ice buckets, bread boards, domestic bread baskets, non-electric coffee percolators, non-electric fruit presses for household purposes, crumb trays, graters, metallic vessels for making ices and iced drinks; drinking glasses; dishes of glass, porcelain or earthenware; dishes, not of precious metal; objects d'art, namely, figurines, statues, statuettes and busts of porcelain, earthenware or glass; vases, candelabras, chandeliers and candle holders, not of precious metal; bottle openers; flagons, bottles sold empty; pots, jugs, pitchers, goblets, gourds and drinking flasks for travelers, and not of precious metal; decanters; perfume burners, perfume sprayers and vaporizers sold empty; china ornaments epergnes, not of precious metal; tea services, not of precious metal, teapots, not of precious metal; non-electric coffeepots and coffee services, not of precious metal; beer mugs; egg cups, not of precious metal; fruit dishes; trivets; hand operated pepper mills and coffee grinders; trays for domestic purposes, not of precious metal; knife rests for the table; toothpick holders, not of precious metal; spice racks and liquor bottle sets; dinnerware; beverage glassware; drinking glasses; champagne glasses; wine glasses; dessert services; candy boxes; flower pots; coasters not of paper and other than table linen; vegetable dishes; butter dishes; table plates; oil cruets; dishes; pepper pots; salt cellars; salad bowls; saucers; soup bowls; sugar bowls; cups;ashtrays; tobacco jars; snuff boxes; jewelry cases; tea strainers, tea caddies, tea infusers; menu card holdersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 7, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance