Drawing for POLYAMP

USPTO serial 76459036

POLYAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura E. Smith, Esq.

LAURA E SMITH ESQ KALOW & SPRINGUT LLP488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Kits comprised of reagents for amplification of a library of messenger RNA for the retention of 5' sequence information even after multiple rounds of amplification for scientific and medical researchACTIVE—
005Kits comprised of reagents for amplification of a library of messenger RNA for the retention of 5' sequence information even after multiple rounds of amplification for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance