USPTO serial 76459132
LIBERTY TOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275624Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIBERTY TOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MUSKEGON, MI
MUSKEGON, MI
MUSKEGON, MI
Muskegon, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norbert F. Kugele
NORBERT F KUGELE WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP111 LYON STREET N.W.900 FIFTH THIRD CENTERGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503-2487Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL HARDWARE FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; NAMELY, CRANK HANDLES, ADJUSTABLE HANDLES, HAND WHEELS FOR MANUALLY OPERATING VALVES, LOCKING PINS, COTTER PINS, RAILS, RINGS SPECIFICALLY RETAINING, SNAP AND HOISTING RINGS, SHIMS, SLEEVES SPECIFICALLY FOR BORING, MILLING OR HOLDING METAL, SPRINGS, STUDS, AND MANUALLY OPERATED VALVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REID SUPPLY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by REID SUPPLY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by REID SUPPLY COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Reid Tool Supply Company
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named LIBERTY TOOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |