USPTO serial 76459220
H.I.T.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3539168Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2008
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with H.I.T.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edinburgh EH12 6HX, GB
Edinburgh EH12 6HX, GB
Edinburgh EH12 6HX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Cans of metal, of aluminum and of alloys, sold empty, all for alcoholic beverages and with or without inserts incorporating a mechanism for the release and/or generation of gas; metal kegs for alcoholic beverages; metal taps for generating, distributing and dispensing gases into liquid beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Hand operated beer vent taps made of metal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Gas injectors for generating and dispensing gases into liquid beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Non-metal taps for generating distributing and dispensing gases into liquid beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beer, ale, bitter type beer, lager, stout, porter, shandy, and mixtures comprised of the aforesaid goods; non-alcoholic preparations for making alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit-flavoured drink mixes, fruit juice mixes, vegetable-flavoured drink mixes, vegetable juice mixes, and cordial mixes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Scottish & Newcastle plc
- Other trademarks owned by Scottish & Newcastle plc
- Other trademarks owned by Scottish & Newcastle plc
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named H.I.T.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |