USPTO serial 76459329
RAYWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAYWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bragg
MICHAEL J BRAGG GRENLEY ROTENBERG EVANS BRAGG1211 SW 5TH AVE STE 1100PORTLAND, OR 97204-3737UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Plastic impregnated lumber; plastic impregnated wood flooring, plastic impregnated wood beams; plastic impregnated wood for use in furniture, kitchen accessories, countertops cabinets, patio accessories, boats decks, boat deck accents, implement handles, and arts and crafts | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of wood by impregnating wood with plastic | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |