USPTO serial 76459644
GEAR FORCE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3143849Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GEAR FORCE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LLOYD G. FARR
LLOYD G. FARR Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP100 North Tryon Street42nd Floor, IP DepartmentCharlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | DRIVE MECHANISMS AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF HAND TOOLS, NAMELY RATCHETS, SOCKET SETS, WRENCHES AND SCREWDRIVERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hand Tool Design Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hand Tool Design Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Hand Tool Design Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named GEAR FORCE TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |