USPTO serial 76460006
ROUGH CUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROUGH CUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. G. Horowitz
Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO AND DATA STORAGE SYSTEM CONSISTING OF A STORAGE DRIVE, DATA STORAGE TAPES, CABLES AND APPLICATION SOFTWARE USED FOR SCANNING AND CREATING BACK-UP FILES FOR STORAGE OF VIDEO AND DATA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |