Drawing for THE FATHER OF INTERNAL SKINCARE

USPTO serial 76460594

THE FATHER OF INTERNAL SKINCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FATHER OF INTERNAL SKINCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. PAINTER, ESQ.

MICHAEL A PAINTER ESQ ISAACMAN, KAUFMAN & PAINTER8484 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211-3222UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003skin care products, namely exfoliating creams, skin cleanser, facial scrub, skin astringent, skin moisturizer and night cream; hand and body moisturizer, bath and shower gelee, hair shampoo and hair conditioner, tanning lotion, bath oil, anti-wrinkle cream, moisture cream and under eye coverACTIVE
005vitamins and dietary food supplementsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 17, 2004REINREINSTATED
Jun 9, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 19, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance