USPTO serial 76460726
MARS INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 2, 2004
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARS INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pleasanton, CA
Pleasanton, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin R. Martin
KEVIN R MARTIN MCNICHOLS RANDICK O'DEA & TOOLIATOS LLP5000 HOPYARD RD STE 400PLEASANTON, CA 94588UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |