USPTO serial 76460845
LINK2UTILITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINK2UTILITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
ROBERT P FELBER JR NASHVILLE CITYWALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS PLLC511 UN ST STE 2100NASHVILLE, TN 37219-1760Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, utility bill payment and payment processing services for utilities companies via telephone, electronic transmission, wireless transmission, and a global computer network; electronic tax payment processing services for utility companies via electronic transmission, wireless transmission, telephone and a global computer network; computer consultation services relating to setting up interactive payment and processing networks and data processing systems for the transmission of data; maintenance and operation of computer networks and payment and payment processing systems; designing, planning and developing equipment and installations for others for credit authorization, billing and payment to utility companies; designing, planning and developing equipment and installations for others for means of identification, authentication and cashless electronic payment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |