USPTO serial 76461288
AMERICAN DJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2006
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICAN DJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth L. Sherman
JOSHUA A SCHAUL SHERMAN & ZARRABIAN LLP1519 26TH STREETSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADJ PRODUCTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by American DJ Supply, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American DJ Supply, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American DJ Supply, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AMERICAN DJ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2014 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |