Drawing for SAND VIDEO

USPTO serial 76461392

SAND VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAND VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GAILYC C. SONIA

MICHAEL K BARRON ESQ NIXON PEABODY LLP100 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-2131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion video compression software for use in hardware, software and Internet based applicationsACTIVE—
040Digital compression of motion videos for use in hardware, software and Internet based applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 20031.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Oct 30, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Oct 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance