Drawing for PARTY SNACKS

USPTO serial 76461557

PARTY SNACKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARTY SNACKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Cyril Malloy, III

JOHN CYRIL MALLOY III HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW THIRD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030staple foods, namely, cheese balls, pretzels, potato chips, tortilla chips, corn chips, and onion ringsACTIVEJul 9, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 10, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 14, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance