Drawing for ALL-IN-1 ATM

USPTO serial 76461663

ALL-IN-1 ATM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL-IN-1 ATM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automated Teller Machine (ATM) facilitating credit and POS debit card advancesACTIVEJul 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 19, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 10, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance