USPTO serial 76461906
CHICAS LOCAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHICAS LOCAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F ALEC ORUDJEV
RICHARD AULICINOPO BOX GNEW YORK, NY 10034UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Videos, DVDs, recording discs featuring adult-oriented entertainment involving young women in public venues | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing and headgear, namely, T-shirts and baseball caps | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Business management consulting services, namely, marketing videos, DVDs, recording discs, and clothing and headgear including T-shirts and baseball caps via the global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Locas Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Locas Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CHICAS LOCAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |