USPTO serial 76462060
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3360112Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2007
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CREDIT CARD SERVICES; CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES; CREDIT CARD VERIFICATION; CREDIT RECOVERY AND COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS; LOAN FINANCING; BANKING; ONLINE FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF INVESTMENT SECURITY, SURETY SERVICES, FINANCIAL GUARANTEE AND SURETY | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2010 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |