Drawing for STAIN DEFENSE

USPTO serial 76462180

STAIN DEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSLICK, SCOTT
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STAIN DEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clark A. Puntigam

CLARK A PUNTIGAM JENSEN & PUNTIGAM, PS2033 SIXTH AVE #1020SEATTLE, WA 98121-2554UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024mattress padsABANDONEDOct 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 17, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 17, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 17, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 12, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance