Drawing for ALPHAPALZ

USPTO serial 76462726

ALPHAPALZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALPHAPALZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOYS FOR CHILDREN, NAMELY, CONNECTABLE PLASTIC LETTERS AS CHARACTER FIGURESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 7, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 15, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 3, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 31, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 5, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 23, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 23, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance