USPTO serial 76462807
COCOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COCOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Recaro Aircraft Seating GmbH & Co.
74523 Schwabisch Hall, DE
Other trademarks owned by Recaro Aircraft Seating GmbH & Co.
Recaro Aircraft Seating GmbH & Co.
74523 Schwabisch Hall, DE
Other trademarks owned by Recaro Aircraft Seating GmbH & Co.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Bicks
MARK S BICKS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLES SEATS, SEATS FOR AIR PASSENGERS, SEATS, ARM RESTS, SAFETY SEAT BELTS, HEAD RESTS, RAILS, RODS AND FRAMES FOR FASTENING HEAD RESTS, RAILS, RODS AND FRAMES FOR FASTENING THE AFORESAID PARTS TOGETHER AND/OR TO THE VEHICLE; SHOCK ABSORBERS FOR SAFETY BELTS, SEATS AND HEAD RESTS; VEHICLE PARTS, NAMELY PLASTIC MOLDABLE PARTS AND ELASTIC PARTS FOR SEATS AND DASHBOARDS IN THE NATURE OF SEPARATION WALLS, TABLE DIVIDERS AND COVERING SHELTERS, PLASTIC MOLDABLE HEAD RESTS; FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODS, NAMELY, MECHANICAL ADJUSTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |