USPTO serial 76463117
YOGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald R. Thompson
GERALD R THOMPSON THOMPSON & THOMPSON, PC39555 ORCH HL PL STE 205NOVI, MI 48375UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software development tools, computer software for application and database integration, database management software for general use, website development software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business process re-engineering services, computerized database management, data processing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software consultation, computer software design for others, computer software development, licensing of computer software, repair of computer software, updating of computer software for others, maintenance of computer software, providing quality assurance services in the field of software development, software services and process engineering, application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yogin, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Yogin, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named YOGIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |