USPTO serial 76463266
SPYGLASS INTEGRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2975098Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPYGLASS INTEGRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
LEXINGTON, MA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace J. Han
GRACE J HAN TRADEMARK/IP PRACTICE GROUPPERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business marketing consulting in the nature of assistance in helping third parties in the establishment and management/administration of interactive broadcasting services, two-way digital cable services, and direct-to-home satellite services; two-way digital cable broadcast project management services; direct-to-home satellite project management services; business consultation services in the areas of selection, implementation, management, deployment, broadcast project management and use of interactive television, video-on-demand, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home satellite services and technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Interactive television and video-on-demand broadcasting and transmission services; consulting services in the fields of cable and television broadcasting and communication/telecommunication services, namely consultation services for the design, selection, implementation, management, deployment, and use of interactive television, video-on-demand, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home satellite services and technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software development; design and integration of computer systems and networks; computer project management services; providing quality assurance testing in the fields of interactive television, video-on-demand, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home satellite, web and computer applications; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; consulting services in the field of web and computer applications and systems for others; computer consulting services in connection with computers interacting with interactive television, video-on-demand, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home satellite; technical consultation in the field of interactive, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home satellite broadcasting; consultation services in the design of interactive television, video-on-demand, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home satellite services and technology; all of the foregoing services in the fields of interactive, video-on-demand, two-way digital cable, and direct-to-home broadcasting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPYGLASS INTEGRATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPYGLASS INTEGRATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPYGLASS INTEGRATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OpenTV, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SPYGLASS INTEGRATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |