Drawing for HAVANA NIGHT

USPTO serial 76463504

HAVANA NIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAVANA NIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer K. Craft, Esq., Bryce K. Earl, Esq., Brett D. Ekins, Esq., James D. Boyle, Esq. and Ben West, Esq.

JENNIFER K CRAFT, ESQ BRYCE K EARL SANTORO, DRIGGS, WALCH, KEARNEY, JOHNSON400 S 4TH ST 3RD FLLAS VEGAS, NV 89101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003EAU DE PERFUME AND EAU DE TOILETACTIVE—
014JEWELRY, NAMELY WATCHES, CLOCKS, SILVER AND GOLD JEWELRYACTIVE—
021DOMESTIC UTENSILS, NAMELY SHOT GLASSES, MUGS, STIRRERS, SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS, DECORATIVE PLATESACTIVE—
028TOYS, NAMELY, ACTION FIGURE DOLLS, AND ACCESSORIESACTIVE—
034CIGAR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY CIGAR CASES, AND BOXES, CIGAR CUTTERS, CIGAR POUCHES, NON-PRECIOUS METAL ASHTRAYS, LIGHTERS AND HUMIDORSACTIVE—
041PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURES AND MUSICAL AND DRAMATIC SERIES BY MEANS OF AND FOR CABLE TELEVISION AND SATELLITE-DELIVERED TELEVISION BROADCASTINGACTIVE—
043RESTAURANT SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 16, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 23, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance