Drawing for GRAPEVINE EVERYBODY'S TALKING.

USPTO serial 76463530

GRAPEVINE EVERYBODY'S TALKING.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAPEVINE EVERYBODY'S TALKING.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I.C. Waddey, Jr.

IC WADDEY JR WADDEY & PATTERSON414 UN ST STE 2020BANK OF AMERICA PLZNASHVILLE, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Local and long distance telephone services; Providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 18, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 8, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 30, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance