Drawing for GRAPEVINE

USPTO serial 76463744

GRAPEVINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAPEVINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I.C. Waddey, Jr.

IC WADDEY JR WADDEY & PATTERSON414 UN ST STE 2020BANK OF AMERICA PLZNASHVILLE, TN 37219-1767

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Local and long distance telephone services; Providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 18, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 27, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 29, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 20, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 20, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 9, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 8, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance