USPTO serial 76463752
LYPSYL CONDITION & PROTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LYPSYL CONDITION & PROTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lornamead Home & Personal Care Limited
St. Peter, Jersey, GB
Other trademarks owned by Lornamead Home & Personal Care Limited
Lornamead Home & Personal Care Limited
St. Peter, Jersey, GB
Other trademarks owned by Lornamead Home & Personal Care Limited
CHANNEL ISLANDS, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE S BLANCHARD
LESLIE S BLANCHARD PENN STUART & ESKRIDGEPO BOX 2288ABINGDON, VA 24212-2288UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NON-MEDICATED LIP SALVES AND OINTMENTS, AND LIP BALMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lornamead Home & Personal Care Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Lornamead Home & Personal Care Limited
- Other trademarks owned by LYPSYL HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named LYPSYL CONDITION & PROTECT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |