USPTO serial 76463755
APPALACHALOOZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APPALACHALOOZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Ron Milkes
WILLIAM A FINKELSTEIN ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP4TH FL N TWR1620 26TH STSANTA MONICA, CA 90404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely production and organization of live entertainment events, namely concerts, concert tours and festivals in the fields of music and the arts; live and recorded performances by musical groups; production and distribution of motion picture films, television programs and sound recordings concerning music, musicians and/or artisans and artwork; providing information for and/or actual entertainment via a global computer network in the field of entertainment relating specifically to music, musicians and/or artisans and artwork; providing general interest news, entertainment, and educational information via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |