USPTO serial 76463999
ARRAYF(X)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARRAYF(X)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pittsburgh, PA
Pittsburgh, PA
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia E. Kernick
TIMOTHY G HOFMEYER ICORIA LEGAL DEPTPO BOX 14528 108 T W ALEXANDER DRPATENT & TRADEMARK DEPTRESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709-4528Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Image processing in the biotechnology, bioengineering and development, pharmaceutical, and genomics industry, namely, transferring images from tissue array slides to a digital format | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Biological feature recognition services in the biotechnology, bioengineering and development, pharmaceutical, and genomics industries, namely, comparing, contrasting, and identifying features of biological tissue array | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tissueinformatics.Inc
- Other trademarks owned by Tissueinformatics.Inc
- Other trademarks owned by PARADIGM GENETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ICORIA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARRAYF(X)
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |