Drawing for STAUDIO

USPTO serial 76464126

STAUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan M. Meschkow, Esq.

JORDAN M MESCHKOW ESQ MESCHKOW & GRESHAM, PLC5727 N 7TH ST STE 409PHOENIX, AZ 85014-5818UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Amplifiers, audio signal processors and related audio equipment, namely mixers, crossovers, compressors; namely, devices used to compress audio signals to lessen and minimize distortion, limiters, gates, equalizers, noise reduction devices, line amplifiers, routers, synthesizers, signal generators, transducers, speakers, transformers, microphones; Computer hardware and operating software that runs a network of audio products; Networking hardware; namely, optic and electric cabling, computer hardware or operating software for use in monitoring, operating, and controlling an audio system and control panels and displays; Switching controls for audio signal circuits; Network devices, namely computer interface boards for providing interface between audio products, musical instruments, audio recorders, or public address systems, and associated operating softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance