USPTO serial 76464179
USB DIRECT VIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with USB DIRECT VIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN6300 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6357Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer printers; image scanners; liquid crystal proiectors; liquid crystal televisions; CD-R (CD-Recordable) drives, CD-RW (CD-Rewritable) drives, DVD-R (Digital Versatile Disc-Recordable) drives, DVD-RW (Digital Versatile Disc Rewritable) drives; digital cameras; computer software for connecting electronic devices; video projectors; video cameras; downloadable electronic publications, namely, magazines and newsletters featuring information about computers, computer printers, image scanners, liquid crystal projectors, liquid crystal televisions, CD-R (CD-Recordable) drives, CD-RW (CD-Rewritable) drives DVD-R (Digital Versatile Disc-Recordable) drives, DVD-RW (Digital Versatile Disc Rewritable) drives, digital cameras, computer software for connecting electronic devices, video projectors, and video cameras | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |