USPTO serial 76464190
ECO-ORDINATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-ORDINATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Alexander Baratta
JOSEPH ALEXANDER BARATTA BARATTA & GOLDSTEIN597 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-1020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Pillows, decorative pillows and chair pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bathroom accessories, namely tumblers and toothbrush holders; soap dish, lotion dispenser; soap dispenser; trash container for household use; wastebaskets; voitive candleholders not of precious metal and candleholders not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Comforters; blanket throws; afghans; coverlets; bed sheets; pillow cases; duvets; shams; dust ruffles unfitted fabric furniture covers; shower curtains; window treatments, namely draperies, curtains, fabric valences, curtain panels and tiebacks; table linens, namely placemats made of fabric and napkins made of fabric; kitchen towels; pot holders; and oven mits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PARK B. SMITH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PARK B. SMITH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ECO-ORDINATES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |