Drawing for NETPROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE

USPTO serial 76464310

NETPROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETPROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David N. Makous, Esq.

DAVID N MAKOUS ESQ LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Network intrusion prevention systems, namely computer security hardware which is utilized as a security device for protecting the incoming lines of the ISP's markets, for protecting incoming lines and serversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 21, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 18, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance