USPTO serial 76464315
MINI STAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINI STAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
96242 Sonnefeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter C. Stomma
Peter C. Stomma Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.840 N. Plankinton AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Baby bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Portable child seats, in particular portable child seats for connection to a pram or buggy; prams, parasols for prams, strollers, in particular collapsible strollers; buggies | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Sling bags for carrying infants, backpacks for carrying infants, baby carriers worn on the body, baby accessory bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Playpens, aids for helping children lean to walk, baby rockers, high chairs,table seats, swings, baby changing tables, cradles | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Foot muffs (not electrically heated), baby bibs not of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Baby rattles; miniature models of strollers, in particular collapsible strollers and parasols therefor, carrying bags, carrying frames, foot muffs, rockers,high chairs, swings, cradles, all being playthings; dolls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAUCK GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MINI STAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |