USPTO serial 76464951
ORASTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORASTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Cruz County, CA
Santa Cruz County, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Medicated toothpaste, medicated dental gels; medicated mouthwashes; medicated mouth rinses; chewing gums and lozenges which provide a protective dental or gingival barrier, coating or sealant for preventive, prophylactic or therapeutic hygiene use, medicated rawhide chews for dogs, medicated rawhide chews for animals, medicated inedible chews for dogs, medicated inedible chews for animals, medicated animal feed, medicated animal foodstuffs, medicated cat food, medicated edible cat treats, medicated dog biscuits, medicated dog food, edible medicated dog treats, medicated edible chews for animals, medicated food for animals, medicated pet beverages, medicated pet food, medicated pig feed, medicated edible cat treats, edible medicated dog treats, and edible medicated animal treats, medicated additives for animal feed, medicated additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as ingredient in animal feed | ACTIVE | Sep 22, 2000 |
| 018 | Rawhide chews for dogs, rawhide chews for animals, inedible chews for dogs, inedible chews for animals, inedible devices to be chewed by dogs, inedible devices to be chewed by animals | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Toothbrushes; dental flosses; dental tapes; dental ribbons; interdental cleaners, namely, interdental brushes for domestic use, dental picks and toothpicks which provide a protective dental or gingival barrier, coating or sealant for preventive, prophylactic or therapeutic oral hygiene use | ACTIVE | Dec 2, 1998 |
| 031 | Non-medicated additives for animal feed, non-medicated additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as ingredient in animal feed, animal feed, animal foodstuffs, cat food, edible cat treats, dog biscuits, dog food, edible dog treats, edible chews for animals, food for animals, pet beverages, pet food, pig feed, edible treats, edible animal treats, edible cat treats, edible dog treats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Four Star Partners
- Other trademarks owned by Four Star Partners
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ORASTAR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |