USPTO serial 76465398
SAZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ST. GALLEN, CH
D-30823 Garbsen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL HORMANN
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANNPO BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising agency, preparing and placing advertisements for others, direct mail advertising, advertising by electronic billboards, dissemination of advertising matter; advertising and marketing, marketing consulting, organization and administration of address data banks for others; organization and administration of business activities for others, namely office administration, personnel supervision, accountancy; computerized data base management; data processing in the fields of accounting, billing and inventory | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Rental and leasing of real estate for others; realty and financial management for others; financial planning and portfolio management for others; financial research for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing and leasing of computer software for and to others; operation and development of direct marketing concepts for others; graphic and commercial art design; awareness of the need for new products; computer consultation; computer programming for others; computer services, namely leasing access time to computer data bases in the field business systems solutions; conducting feasibility studies; software development consultation; leasing and rental of computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |