CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JEWELSTONE

USPTO serial 76465456

JEWELSTONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JEWELSTONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

the firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, MICHAEL F. CLAYTON, JAMES R. SIMS III, RON N. DREBEN, KAREN A. BUTCHER, BRETT I. MILLER, ANITA B. POLOTT , CAROLE R. KLEIN, ALBERT G. TRAMPOSCH, MEREDITH A. CARLO, JOSEPH E. WASHINGTON, ASHLEY A. PHILLIPS, HENRY SH

TMSU JEFFREY H GREENE & KRISTIN H ALTOFFMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for record keeping for the financial services industry; computer software for fund accountingACTIVE—
035Providing computerized fund accounting services; providing computerized corporate accounting services; computerized record keeping service; database management services; shareholder record keeping services; business continuity servicesACTIVE—
039Storage services for archiving database, images, and other electronic dataACTIVE—
042Computer programming services for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 29, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 2, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 3, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance