Drawing for DATALERTS

USPTO serial 76465520

DATALERTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DATALERTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Willsey, Esq.

PETER J WILLSEY ESQ COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE FREEDOM SQ RESTON TOWN CTR11951 FREEDOM DRRESTON, VA 20190-5656

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT MONITORS CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO INFORMATION IN DATABASES AND PROVIDES AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION TO USERS OF CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO INFORMATION TN DATABASESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 27, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 26, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 26, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 26, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 24, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance