USPTO serial 76465522
LVIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LVIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, JP
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B MURRAY
ROBERT B MURRAY ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PAPERS FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES, NAMELY ADHESIVE PAPERS, ADHESIVE PROCESSED PAPERS, RELEASE PAPERS, RELEASE PROCESSED PAPERS, SYNTHETIC PAPERS, AND PAPERS FOR TRANSFERRING LETTERS OR PICTURES TO OTHER MATERIALS; PAPERS AND ADHESIVE PAPERS FOR PACKING; PAPERS AND ADHESIVE PAPERS FOR DECORATING PURPOSES; PAPERS, ADHESIVE PAPERS, RELEASE PAPERS AND ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY; PAPERS, ADHESIVE PAPERS AND RELEASE PAPERS FOR PRINTING; PAPERS FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS, NAMELY ADHESIVE PAPERS, RELEASE PAPERS, RECORD PAPERS, HEAT SENSITIVE PAPERS AND PAPERS FOR USE IN OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION DEVICES; PRINTED LABELS; PLASTIC FILMS, PLASTIC SHEETS AND LABELS FOR WRITING, PRINTING AND MARKING; METALLIC FOIL SHEETS AND LABELS FOR WRITING, PRINTING AND MARKING; PAPERS AND FILMS FOR DECALS AND DECALCOMANIA; MARKING TABS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |