USPTO serial 76465582
KIDS WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KIDS WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele L. McShane
MICHELE L MCSHANE MATTEL INCLAW DEPT M1-1518333 CONTINENTAL BLVDEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-5012Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | INFANTS', TODDLERS' AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, BODYSUITS, CLOTH BIBS, COVERALLS, INFANTWEAR, LEGGINGS, UNDERCLOTHES, UNDERGARMENTS AND UNDERWEAR, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, PANTS, JEANS, JOGGING SUITS, SHORTS, BELTS, OVERALLS, DRESSES, JUMPERS, SLEEPERS, PULLOVERS, DIAPER SETS; NAMELY, SHIRT AND DIAPER COVERS, ROMPERS, KIMONOS, FOOTED SHIRT AND PAJAMA BOTTOMS, TERRY CLOTH CAPES WITH HOODS, ONE PIECE SNOW SUITS, TWO PIECE SNOW SUITS, JACKETS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, SOCKS, HATS, GLOVES, MITTENS, BONNETS AND HEADBANDS, CHILDREN'S AND INFANT'S SHOES AND BOOTS, NAMELY ATHLETIC SHOES, DRESS SHOES, CRIB SHOES, CASUAL SHOES, BEACH AND NON-BEACH SANDALS, SNOW BOOTS, SLIPPER SOCKS, SLIPPERS AND HIKER-STYLE BOOTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | HAIR ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, PONYTAIL HOLDERS, BARRETTES AND HAIR BOWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |