USPTO serial 76465812
MURRAY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MURRAY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Overland Park, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thad N. Leach
THAD N LEACH LEWIS, RICE & FINGERSH, L.C.500 N BROADWAY STE 2000ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |