USPTO serial 76465925
ORIMULSION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORIMULSION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myles J. Tralins
MYLES J TRALINS TRALINS AND ASSOCIATES2930 ONE BISCAYNE TWR2 S BISCAYNE BLVDMIAMI, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BITUMEN-IN-WATER EMULSION FOR USE IN THE MANUFCTURE OF LIQUID FUEL | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 004 | LIQUID BASE LOAD FUEL FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT FOR THE ENERGY SECTOR; CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES IN THE ENERGY SECTOR | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 039 | STORAGE OF A LIQUIDBASE LOAD FUEL FOR OTHERS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR; TRANSPORTATION BY SHIPPING FOR THE ENERGY SECTORSECTOR | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1989 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE ENERGY SECTOR; AND COMPUTER SERVICES; NAMELY, LEASING ACCESS TIME TO COMPUTER DATABASES IN THE ENERGY SECTOR | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BITUMENES ORINOCO, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORIMULSION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |