USPTO serial 76466015
FITNESS 24-7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FITNESS 24-7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Troy Titus
TROY TITUS TITUS LAW GROUP5221 INDIAN RIV RDVIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23464-6128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Health club services for women only, namely providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exercise; physical fitness consultation and instruction for women only; personal training services, namely, strength and conditioning training for women only; educational services, namely, providing classes, programs, training and seminars in the field of physical and sports activities for women only regarding weight loss, weight management, nutrition, strength and resistance training, aerobics, body sculpting, cardiovascular training, fitness testing and wellness programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |