Drawing for DAILY YOUTH

USPTO serial 76466209

DAILY YOUTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAILY YOUTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

114 OLD COUNTRY RDSTE 310MINEOLA, NY 11501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL DRINKS IN THE NATURE OF DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL TEAS FOR MEDICINAL PURPOSESACTIVE—
032THIRST-QUENCHING BEVERAGES, NAMELY, FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES AND NON-CARBONATED AND CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; FLAVORED AND UNFLAVORED WATERS, NAMELY, MINERAL WATER, SPRING WATER, CARBONATED WATER; POWDERS, SYRUPS, ESSENCES, EXTRACTS, PREPARATIONS AND CONCENTRATES USED FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES, CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS; NONALCOHOLIC MALT BEVERAGEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 4, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance